Op-Ed: “That’s What You Want to Hear”

Source: By Editorial Board, Wall Street Journal • Posted: Friday, October 12, 2018

In the movie “Field of Dreams”, someone asks the lead character played by Kevin Costner is this is heaven?  No he says, “it’s Iowa”.  But it is political heaven if you’re a corn farmer who sells to ethanol refiners, as President Trump is proving this week with one more favor for the fuel made with corn and your tax dollars.

“And my Administration is protecting ethanol, all right?  That’s what you want to hear,” Mr. Trump said at a rally in Iowa on Tuesday, and give him points for political candor.  Mr. Trump then announced that his Administration will now allow fuel with 15% ethanol to be sold all year long.  The Clean Air Act sets standards for fuel volatility, and E15 hasn’t been allowed in the summer because it can cause smog.  Most blends contain 10% of ethanol.

On the plus side, the White House isn’t mandating or subsidizing more ethanol, which is already pushed into the fuel supply at increasing rates under the renewable fuels standard.  In an ideal market, ethanol blends could compete with regular gasoline year round with the potpourri of government distortions.  (We can dream too.)

Some 20 Senators from both parties pointed out in a letter last week that the agency doesn’t have the legal authority to waive the Clean Air Act’s standards.  The law lays out a waiver process for “blends containing gasoline and 10 percent denatured anhydrous ethanol”.  But nowhere is a 15% blend mentioned.

EPA said in 20111 that it doesn’t believe it has the authority to allow year-round sales of E15, and that is not remembered as an era of agency restraint.  If the standards are too strict, then Congress should change them.  Oil companies plan to sue, even if their less than pure motive is heading off competition from cheap ethanol amid rising oil prices.

The other issue is how little reformers appear to be getting in exchange.  The Trump Administration says it is considering changes to compliance credits known in the ‘lingua franca’ as “renewable identification numbers”, or RINS, which companies have to buy if they don’t reach ethanol blending quotas.  The East Coast refiner Philadelphia Energy Solutions paid $300 million for RINs in 2017 (twice the company’s payroll).

The White House cited speculators as one area for reform, but RINs are expensive because so many companies have to buy credits in lieu of blending a marginal gallon of ethanol.  In other words, RINs are expensive because the credits are scarce.  The Administration also said it would focus on transparency, though everyone knows the real problem.

If there’s more demand for E15, perhaps RINs would be less expensive, though even Iowa sells four times the amount of E0—no ethanol—as it does E15 and E85 combined.  At this point the Administration should at least cap the price on RINs—a maximum penalty for noncompliance—or allow exports to create RINs and thus increase supply of the credits.

We almost feel like chumps for bringing up small matters like the law and economics, since the new policy is so clearly a sop to farmers hit hard by Mr. Trump’s tariff policy.  As ever, one bad policy leads to another.”