EPA Chief Says Agency, California ‘Far Apart’ on Car Emissions

Source: By Ryan Beene , Jennifer A Dlouhy , and David R Baker, Bloomberg • Posted: Tuesday, February 5, 2019

The Trump administration and California clean-air officials remain “pretty far apart” in their bid to strike an agreement on automobile fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions rules as federal regulators race to finalize a key proposal for the auto industry, the U.S. EPA chief said Monday.

“We certainly hope to have a 50-state solution but at the end of the day we have to move forward with regulation,” Environmental Protection Agency Acting Administrator Andrew Wheeler told Bloomberg Television in an interview Monday. “California is an important player — an important part of this — but this is not a two-sided negotiation for a national standard.”

Wheeler planned to meet with California Air Resources Board Chairman Mary Nichols later on Monday to discuss the standards, he said. Wheeler said he would prefer to reach a deal with California, but said the state should not be able to dictate the requirements. The EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have already proposed stripping California of its authority to set its own tailpipe greenhouse gas emission limits for new cars and trucks, a potent bargaining chip to extract concessions from the largest state for U.S. auto sales.

In the interview, Wheeler said California “should not” have that authority.

“That’s why we would love to have a 50-state solution so we wouldn’t have to pull that trigger,” Wheeler said.

Why Trump Attacks California’s Anti-Pollution Powers: QuickTake

Wheeler’s comments highlight the stalemate between the Trump administration and California officials over fuel economy and tailpipe carbon emissions standards for automobiles, one of former President Barack Obama’s signature policies to ward off climate change.

Wheeler dismissed an earlier counteroffer by California to extend the timeline of the existing requirements, saying it would not lower vehicle prices and improve road safety enough.

The sides have been on a collision course since August, when the EPA and NHTSA proposed capping efficiency standards at a roughly 37-mile-per gallon fleet average from 2020 through 2026 — instead of allowing them to rise to almost 50 miles per gallon by 2025 under the existing rules written by the Obama administration.

Climate Change Pact That Made History Busted by U.S.: QuickTake

Wheeler said the administration must finalize the requirements by early April.

“But we do have some hard deadlines,” he said, adding “and we are pretty far apart.”

Wheeler he gave no hint of a middle ground ahead of his meeting with Nichols later on Monday. The administration argues that freezing future fuel economy increases after 2020 would cut car prices and encourage more people to buy newer, safer and cleaner cars.
Wheeler said California officials are focusing only on energy efficiency, an indication that the state is prioritizing the carbon dioxide impact of the standards. But Wheeler stressed that the greenhouse gas impact of California’s rules — followed by at least 12 other states — is “negligible.”

“This is not a two-sided negotiation,” Wheeler said. “We have more public policy goals than California does, but at the end of the day, we really would like to move in a direction that California is comfortable with, so that we have a 50-state solution and we don’t need to step in and revoke their waiver authority.”

Wheeler also distanced himself from President Donald Trump’s repeated suggestions that cold winter weather undermines arguments the planet is warming.

Read more: Trump’s Climate Tweets Fail Fact Checking by His Own Agency

As brutal cold gripped the country last week, Trump tweeted that it “wouldn’t be bad to have a little of that good old fashioned global warming right now.” Climate scientists said Trump’s tweet conflatedweather — what’s happening now — and climate, or weather patterns over longer time periods.

“I don’t think you can look at any one weather event and determine whether the planet is warming or cooling,” Wheeler said. “I think you have to look at the models overall over a number of years, and you can’t just focus on one particular weather event.”

Asked if that meant Trump’s conclusion might be flawed, Wheeler was quick to clarify he wasn’t correcting his boss.

“Now, I didn’t say that,” Wheeler said. “There’s a lot more variability in the climate models and the climate data than most people realize, and I think the president is reflecting on that.”

— With assistance by Emily Chang

|