2015 ethanol profits average 7 cents per gallon in model plant

Source: By Susanne Retka Schill, Ethanol Producer Magazine • Posted: Friday, January 8, 2016

Net profits in the first half of 2015 held up surprisingly well, writes University of Illinois economist Scott Irwin, and, at 10 cents per gallon, were more than twice the average net profit of 4 cents per gallon from 2007-’12. The last half was more disappointing, with those net profits averaging 3 cents per gallon, with the last four weeks dipping into the negative. Average net profits for the year at the model plant were 7 cents per gallon. The analysis led Irwin to conclude that the record run of ethanol profits in 2013-’14 “were a temporary blip due to a unique set of circumstances rather than a new normal driven by surging ethanol exports.”

Irwin’s analysis, “The Profitability of Ethanol Production in 2015,” utilized a model of a representative Iowa ethanol plant that uses weekly ethanol and DDGS prices at Iowa ethanol plants. Irwin provided other key assumptions made in the model 100 MMgy plant, including debt financing, fixed and variable costs.

Irwin noted the primary price trends: “Ethanol prices started at about $1.30 per gallon at the beginning of 2015, rose to a peak of $1.60 in late May, and then dropped back to $1.30 by the end of the year. DDGS prices were strong in the first half of 2015, peaking near $180 per ton, but then declined precipitously to a low of $104 in October. Total revenue peaked at $2.12 per gallon in mid-May and reached a low for the year of $1.66 in late December.”

On the four major cost components, he noted that corn prices were relatively stable in 2015. “Total [corn] costs fluctuated in a relatively narrow band of about $1.70 to $1.90 per gallon. It is notable that natural gas costs continued to decline in 2015, setting a new low for the 2007-2015 sample period of 7 cents per gallon in mid-December.

Irwin also took a look at the percent return to equity holders, which averaged 9.8 percent over 2007-’15. “The standard deviation, a measure of risk, was 15.3 percent,” he writes. “By comparison, the average return for the stock market over this period, as measured by the S&P 500, was 8.3 percent and the associated standard deviation was 19.7 percent. The ratio of average return to standard deviation provides one measuring stick of an investment’s return-risk attractiveness, and on this measure the ratio for ethanol investment, 0.64, compares favorably with the ratio for the stock market as a whole, 0.42.”

To view the analysis, and the charts drawn from the Iowa plant model, click here.